Friday, June 14, 2013

Assad forces used chemical weapons - White House


Assad forces used chemical weapons - White House

A handout picture released by the opposition-run Shaam News Network shows a sign warning pedestrians of a sniper ahead in a street in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo 6 June 2013Heavily populated Syrian cities such as Aleppo, shown on 6 June, have seen brutal street fighting between Assad's forces and the opposition rebels
Syrian forces under President Bashar al-Assad have used chemical weapons "on a small scale" against the opposition rebels, the White House has said.
A senior aide to President Barack Obama said the US estimated 100-150 people had died in "multiple" attacks.
Ben Rhodes said the US president had decided to provide unspecified "military support" to the opposition.
The White House had previously warned that the US considered the use of such weapons to be crossing a "red line".
'High confidence'

Analysis

America now believes that forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad have used small quantities of chemical weapons, apparently crossing President Obama's "red line". After the experience of Iraq, many will question this until the "evidence" is made public. The BBC investigated one of these incidents, and establishing proof beyond doubt is extremely difficult.
The US says it will now increase "military support" to the armed opposition lead by Gen Idris. What we do not know is whether that means providing "lethal aid" - in other words, weapons.
If the US does and the objective is to press President Assad to attend peace talks, that will be a difficult and lengthy task while Iran and Hezbollah actively bolster Damascus. If the aim it is to facilitate a military victory for the rebels, that will require a massive flow of weapons, it will further regionalise the conflict, and will undoubtedly lead to even more death.
Mr Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser to Mr Obama, said the US had no "reliable" evidence the opposition had used chemical weapons.
The White House announcement came the same day the United Nations said the number of those killed in the Syrian conflict had risen to more than 93,000 people.
"The president has been clear that the use of chemical weapons - or the transfer of chemical weapons to terrorist groups - is a red line for the US," Mr Rhodes said.
"Our intelligence community now has a high confidence assessment that chemical weapons have been used on a small scale by the Assad regime in Syria. The president has said that the use of chemical weapons would change his calculus, and it has."
Mr Rhodes said the president had made the decision to increase assistance, including "military support", to the rebels.
But he declined to detail what would be provided, other than to say it would be "different in scope and scale to what we have provided before".
The White House hopes the increased support will bolster the effectiveness and legitimacy of the both the political and military arms of Syria's rebels, he said.
Senator John McCain: "We don't want boots on the ground"
He said the aid would benefit the Supreme Military Council (SMC) and Syrian Opposition Council, and said the US was "comfortable" working with SMC chief Gen Salim Idris.
"It's been important to work through them while aiming to isolate some of the more extremist elements of the opposition, such as al-Nusra," he said.
The sense of urgency in Washington had been growing as Hezbollah and Iran have increased their own involvement in the conflict, Mr Rhodes said.
'Calculus changed'
The White House announcement immediately shook up the ongoing debate in Washington DC over whether - and how - the US should provide assistance to the rebels.

Start Quote

Many politicians in Britain and France still feel a heavy imperial burden to use their well-honed militaries to re-make the world. Mr Obama, I am sure, feels no such imperative but increasingly finds himself pushed towards acting. Thursday's statement feels half-hearted - because it is”
Republican Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who have been particularly strident in their calls for military aid, said the finding must change US policy in Syria. They called for further action, saying US credibility was on the line.
"A decision to provide lethal assistance, especially ammunition and heavy weapons, to opposition forces in Syria is long overdue, and we hope the president will take this urgently needed step," they said in a joint statement.
"But providing arms alone is not sufficient. The president must rally an international coalition to take military actions to degrade Assad's ability to use airpower and ballistic missiles and to move and resupply his forces around the battlefield by air."
A UN report released on Thursday found at least 5,000 people have been dying in Syria every month since last July, with 30,000 killed since November.
More than 80% of those killed were men, but the UN's Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) says it has also documented the deaths of more than 1,700 children under the age of 10.
Incomplete death toll
Damascus residents
Damascus residents try to get on with ordinary life
On Thursday, Mr Rhodes said US intelligence agencies had concluded Mr Assad's forces had used chemical weapons, including the nerve agent sarin, based on battlefield reports, "descriptions of physiological symptoms" from alleged victims, and laboratory analysis of samples obtained from alleged victims.
However, the full number killed by chemical weapons was "likely incomplete", Mr Rhodes said in a conference call with reporters.
"Put simply, the Assad regime should know that its actions have led us to increase the scope and scale of assistance that we provide to the opposition," he said, including direct support to the SMC.
"These efforts will increase going forward."
Further actions will be taken "on our own timeline", Mr Rhodes said.
Asked whether Mr Obama would back a no-fly zone over Syria, Mr Rhodes said one would not make a "huge difference" on the ground - but would be costly.

No comments: